Tertiary Education System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Tertiary Education System - Essay Example The intention of this study is the tertiary education system is a substitute entry trail to undergraduate education at the University level. The course lengths for tertiary programs are mostly half year with about fifteen contact hours every week. Enabling courses are often varied since there are no excessive rules or principles meaning that several people have access to the programmes when they reach that level of education. These enabling programmes are reacting positively to the local requirements and the broader needs of communities. They vary from short introductory programmes, on-going education support to comprehensive preparatory courses. Tertiary education enabling programmes have been established in conjunction with other institutions like TAFE, secondary education among others. Just like any other level of education, the tertiary enabling programmes also require students to prepare well, be motivated and supported to excel. In terms of fees, the tertiary education system v aries from one university to another in terms of course funding. Tertiary enabling programmes are very helpful to students and the communities because they enable students become successful adults after completing their university education, which leaves them with knowledge and skills to handle serious issues such as career and employment. Note that the enabling programmes can work excellently if they are connected to different initiatives for one year. Therefore, it is important to convince faculties to slot in enabling progressions into their undergraduate programs in order to meet the needs of the students and the society. II. Advantages of Enabling Programmes to: a) Institution Enable a higher preservation tempo of the student population in an institution. Enable superior achievement of the students in terms of their scores in class (Carmichael & Taylor, 2005). Reinforces its relationship with the society. The students can become role models to others and improve their performan ce in class. The weak students get motivation and learn ideas to succeed in their

Scientific Management was the product of 19th Century industrial Essay - 3

Scientific Management was the product of 19th Century industrial practices and has no relevance to the present day. Discuss - Essay Example This term was also used to refer to any organizational system that precisely brought out the functions of groups and individuals. Further, scientific management can be used to describe situations where jobs are categorized and people perform recurring tasks. Background of Taylorism In the 19th century, there were widespread unplanned companies, decentralized management, casual relations among workers and employers, and informally defined job assignments in factory systems. By the end of this century, increased completion, new technologies, demands from regimes and labor agencies, and a developing consciousness by the elites had motivated attempts to advance business and management. All these developments were aimed at initiating cautiously defined processes and risks, which were later referred to by historians as â€Å"systematic management† since they involved a careful study of individuals at work (Cumo 77). The key figure behind this innovation was an engineer based in Amer ica, who was also a management theorist and a discoverer, Fredrick W. Taylor. Taylor was born in 1856 in a Philadelphia family. He began his career in a machine shop in a steel Company in 1878 where he quickly gained experience and started initiating new methods. After approximately ten years, he invented several technical and organizational innovations such as a technique of timing employees with a stopwatch to work out best times. By the 1890s, Taylor had been recognized as the most determined and dynamic advocate of systematic management. He further introduced accounting systems that he became a consultant of the same. This system allowed the use of operating records by managers with greater efficiency, which later became production systems that enlightened managers more accurately on what was happening in the factory, control workers and their tasks, piece-rate models to motivate following of instructions by workers, and various other advancements. A couple of inventions played a big role in the creation of the scientific management theory. The invention of high-speed-steel enhanced the performance of metal-cutting tools, and attempts to initiate systematic techniques resulted in an incorporated view of innovation in management. By 1901, Taylor had styled systematic management to scientific management (Cumo 78). From the actions of Taylor’s career, it is evident that systematic management was closely related to scientific management. They shared origins, liked by similar people, and shared objectives. The distinctions between them also were clear. Systematic management was distributive and practical, some isolated approaches that did not make a larger whole (Sapru 92). On the other hand, scientific management contributed important details and an understandable point of view. Taylor decided to promote the two systems in 1902 when he got out of Bethlehem. The American Society journal first published Taylor’s first documentation on his vocation, â€Å"shop management† in 1903, which was ranked as an inclusive collection of systematic management techniques. In the year 1910, Traylor was involved in scandals with rough enemies of scientific management. In response to the controversies, Taylor came up with a new approach to his system, which he named â€Å"The Principles of Scientific Management.† In this account, he really embraced the term â€Å"Scientific Management† as used it to symbolize the whole system. He argued